Monday 18 February 2013

Decrypting Shahbag (part 1- Background)



The sentencing of Abdul Qader Mollah to life imprisonment failed to satisfy the Bangladeshi people. On the one hand opposition supporters believe that he was completely innocent, on the other, pro government supporters in the guise of Bloggers and Online Activists Network organised a rally and gathered in their tens of thousands in Shahbag to demand the death sentence by hanging, whilst the opposition are being suppressed and prevented from holding their rally.
But that wasn’t all. As soon as they began to call for the death sentence, they also started to call for a ban on religious politics.
So what is going on? Who, and exactly why are they protesting?

Let’s go back forty years from now. The war of independence 1971 many thousands of people killed across Bangladesh by Pakistani forces and their collaborators. Jamaate Islami came out in favour of united Pakistan against what they saw as an Indian conspiracy to occupy East Pakistan by using the freedom fighters as proxy warriors serving Indian interests. After attaining independence, trials began in 1973, trying collaborators and war crimals. However, despite several hundreds of convictions, the trial couldn’t continue, and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman declared a general pardon. Moreover, Bangladesh signed the Simla Agreement which was a triparite agreement between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh which stipulated Pakistani POW’s would be repatriated to Pakistan, effectively pardoning the real war criminals and figureheads.

Ghulam Azam, the leader of Jamaat e Islam at the time, is at the heart of this story. Ghulam Azam lived in exile for several years in the UK before returning in 1987. Since then, under the leadership of Jahanara Imam and Sahriar Kabir, there was a campaign against Ghulam Azam for his opposition to the independence war. Jahanara Imam and Sahriar Kabir formed the  Ekattur Ghatak Dalal Nirmul Committee, an organisation that calls for the hanging of certain Islamist leaders due to their alliance with Pakistan, Jamaate Islam in particular for their collaboration in 1971. It’s a civil society movement consisting of former judges, lawyers, journalists, artists, academics and activists. Though it struggled to keep itself together, it became an effective propagation tool. Their aim was to see the Islamist leaders who supported Pakistan, hanged. But as we shall see, that’s not their only goal.

They did not immediately take legal action . First they needed to create ‘awareness’, through art, propaganda and using other creative mediums. They even did a mock trial in which Golam Azam was found guilty, in a ‘peoples court’. Thus they began a campaign of hatrad against Islamists. Two decades later, the result was Shahbag. It is quite interesting that a member of the Ghatak Dalal Nirmul Committee was presiding over ICT-1 (Nizamul Haque), who later resigned due to his Skype conversation leaks where he colludes with a Bangladeshi expat lawyer in Belgium and insults fellow judges, colleagues and government officials- and this raised questions about the neutrality and conduct of the ICT.

Jamaate Islam on the other hand made the fatal error of trying to evade such propaganda and not addressing it, and thus they are paying the price.

Shahbag, is a result of twenty year of propaganda and campaigning by the likes of Sahriar Kabir, and fellow leftists who dogmatically adhere to ultra secularism. They, like the activists of Shahbag, call for banning religious politics. Amongst those involved in the protests are Qadiyanis who are regarded as heretics by mainstream Muslims. The Committee is said to have historically defended this sect in the name of preventing terrorism and repression. Ironically, the current war crimes trial, which is a fruit of the Committees campaign, is doing exactly that to opposition activists, according to critics. Thus the war crimes trial is part of a bigger project of the ultra secularists to secularise the country. Thus their sincerity in delivering justice to the victims of 1971 is highly questionable, since they are clearly pursuing their vested political interests.

Next: Part 2- Activists of Hate

No comments:

Post a Comment